[Also on Substack]
My friend, analytical philosopher extraordinaire William Vallicella, Ph.D., answered the question, “Why am I bothering to read [Christian apologist Cornelius] Van Til?”
I urge my reader to read Bill’s answer. Since I can’t comment on his Substack, I’ll venture an answer on mine: he’s wrestling with Van Til because Bill’s dialectically sensitive mind, ever open to what might be said against his position, cannot help but entertain the possibility that the sovereign God of Van Til’s theology is the true God. It’s how the God-breathed (theopneustos) Scriptures describe him. But like an open mouth, the open mind, as Chesterton put it so memorably, is ordered toward closing on something.
Bill’s humanistic speculations about “the autonomy of reason” are neither here nor there. His predilection for mediation between extremes notwithstanding, “autonomy” is a fiction. It is arguably a stance that makes God, by His own metaphor, nauseous (Revelation 3:16). Continue reading “Why “bother” to read Van Til? I answer my friend’s question”

