Worldviews, potent and impotent: Noam Chomsky’s “lucky accident”

My work on Philosophy after Christ proceeds; today’s post expresses part of what I mean by philosophy, not only chronologically after Christ’s earthly ministry, but also “according to Christ” (κατὰΧριστόν, kata Christon) (Colossians 2:8). We all take many things for granted. If, however, we would honor our mental obligations, we ought not to take things … Continue reading “Worldviews, potent and impotent: Noam Chomsky’s “lucky accident””

Explanation Unexplained

Does David Ramsay Steele’s Atheism Explained: From Folly to Philosophy confirm aspects of the Square of Religious Opposition discussed in a previous post? [1] In this one I’ll defend an affirmative answer. This square is an aid to thinking about worldviews according to the epistemic authority they presuppose (if not acknowledge) and what it governs, … Continue reading “Explanation Unexplained”